<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Overturns Tax Order Due to Discrepancy in GSTR Returns; Allows Time for Taxpayer to Respond to Demand.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77180</link>
    <description>Validity of assessment order - Disparity in Returns - The High Court examined the case thoroughly. It noted that the entire tax liability stemmed from the disparity between the petitioner&#039;s GSTR 3B return and the auto-populated GSTR 2A return. Considering Circular No.183, which required obtaining a certificate from the supplier, the Court acknowledged that the petitioner eventually obtained the certificate, albeit belatedly. - The High Court, considering the submissions and evidence presented, set aside the impugned order and directed the respondent to provide the petitioner with a fair opportunity to address the tax demand.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 17:26:31 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 17:26:31 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=752210" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Overturns Tax Order Due to Discrepancy in GSTR Returns; Allows Time for Taxpayer to Respond to Demand.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77180</link>
      <description>Validity of assessment order - Disparity in Returns - The High Court examined the case thoroughly. It noted that the entire tax liability stemmed from the disparity between the petitioner&#039;s GSTR 3B return and the auto-populated GSTR 2A return. Considering Circular No.183, which required obtaining a certificate from the supplier, the Court acknowledged that the petitioner eventually obtained the certificate, albeit belatedly. - The High Court, considering the submissions and evidence presented, set aside the impugned order and directed the respondent to provide the petitioner with a fair opportunity to address the tax demand.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 May 2024 17:26:31 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77180</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>