Building-plan sanction charges require statutory authority; unauthorised fees and GST were quashed, while labour cess must follow prescribed collectio...
Pure-agent exclusion fails where hotel booking facilitators receive third-party services themselves, making entire customer consideration taxable as r...
Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
181 to 200 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Validity of assessment order - Disparity in Returns - The High Court examined the case thoroughly. It noted that the entire tax liability stemmed from the disparity between the petitioner's GSTR 3B return and the auto-populated GSTR 2A return. Considering Circular No.183, which required obtaining a certificate from the supplier, the Court acknowledged that the petitioner eventually obtained the certificate, albeit belatedly. - The High Court, considering the submissions and evidence presented, set aside the impugned order and directed the respondent to provide the petitioner with a fair opportunity to address the tax demand.
Validity of assessment order - Disparity in Returns - The High Court examined the case thoroughly. It noted that the entire tax liability stemmed from the disparity between the petitioner's GSTR 3B return and the auto-populated GSTR 2A return. Considering Circular No.183, which required obtaining a certificate from the supplier, the Court acknowledged that the petitioner eventually obtained the certificate, albeit belatedly. - The High Court, considering the submissions and evidence presented, set aside the impugned order and directed the respondent to provide the petitioner with a fair opportunity to address the tax demand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.