Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
701 to 720 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Liquidation of corporate Debtor - Eligibility of the Appellant to submit the Resolution Plan under section 29 A of IBC - The tribunal upheld the declaration that the appellant was a wilful defaulter, making him ineligible under Section 29A of the IBC to submit a resolution plan. This was a significant factor in the rejection of his resolution plan and the subsequent decision to liquidate. - The tribunal highlighted the autonomy of the CoC's commercial wisdom in deciding not to approve the resolution plan submitted by the appellant. It noted that such decisions are beyond the scope of judicial review. - The tribunal noted that any ad-interim relief obtained by the appellant against his wilful defaulter status did not override the CoC's decision-making power, as the stay was conditional and temporary.
Liquidation of corporate Debtor - Eligibility of the Appellant to submit the Resolution Plan under section 29 A of IBC - The tribunal upheld the declaration that the appellant was a wilful defaulter, making him ineligible under Section 29A of the IBC to submit a resolution plan. This was a significant factor in the rejection of his resolution plan and the subsequent decision to liquidate. - The tribunal highlighted the autonomy of the CoC's commercial wisdom in deciding not to approve the resolution plan submitted by the appellant. It noted that such decisions are beyond the scope of judicial review. - The tribunal noted that any ad-interim relief obtained by the appellant against his wilful defaulter status did not override the CoC's decision-making power, as the stay was conditional and temporary.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.