<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Upholds CoC&#039;s Decision: Appellant&#039;s Resolution Plan Rejected Due to Willful Default Status Under IBC.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77075</link>
    <description>Liquidation of corporate Debtor - Eligibility of the Appellant to submit the Resolution Plan under section 29 A of IBC - The tribunal upheld the declaration that the appellant was a wilful defaulter, making him ineligible under Section 29A of the IBC to submit a resolution plan. This was a significant factor in the rejection of his resolution plan and the subsequent decision to liquidate. - The tribunal highlighted the autonomy of the CoC&#039;s commercial wisdom in deciding not to approve the resolution plan submitted by the appellant. It noted that such decisions are beyond the scope of judicial review. - The tribunal noted that any ad-interim relief obtained by the appellant against his wilful defaulter status did not override the CoC&#039;s decision-making power, as the stay was conditional and temporary.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 07:17:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 07:17:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751866" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Upholds CoC&#039;s Decision: Appellant&#039;s Resolution Plan Rejected Due to Willful Default Status Under IBC.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77075</link>
      <description>Liquidation of corporate Debtor - Eligibility of the Appellant to submit the Resolution Plan under section 29 A of IBC - The tribunal upheld the declaration that the appellant was a wilful defaulter, making him ineligible under Section 29A of the IBC to submit a resolution plan. This was a significant factor in the rejection of his resolution plan and the subsequent decision to liquidate. - The tribunal highlighted the autonomy of the CoC&#039;s commercial wisdom in deciding not to approve the resolution plan submitted by the appellant. It noted that such decisions are beyond the scope of judicial review. - The tribunal noted that any ad-interim relief obtained by the appellant against his wilful defaulter status did not override the CoC&#039;s decision-making power, as the stay was conditional and temporary.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 07:17:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77075</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>