Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Liquidation of corporate Debtor - Eligibility of the Appellant to submit the Resolution Plan under section 29 A of IBC - The tribunal upheld the declaration that the appellant was a wilful defaulter, making him ineligible under Section 29A of the IBC to submit a resolution plan. This was a significant factor in the rejection of his resolution plan and the subsequent decision to liquidate. - The tribunal highlighted the autonomy of the CoC's commercial wisdom in deciding not to approve the resolution plan submitted by the appellant. It noted that such decisions are beyond the scope of judicial review. - The tribunal noted that any ad-interim relief obtained by the appellant against his wilful defaulter status did not override the CoC's decision-making power, as the stay was conditional and temporary.
Liquidation of corporate Debtor - Eligibility of the Appellant to submit the Resolution Plan under section 29 A of IBC - The tribunal upheld the declaration that the appellant was a wilful defaulter, making him ineligible under Section 29A of the IBC to submit a resolution plan. This was a significant factor in the rejection of his resolution plan and the subsequent decision to liquidate. - The tribunal highlighted the autonomy of the CoC's commercial wisdom in deciding not to approve the resolution plan submitted by the appellant. It noted that such decisions are beyond the scope of judicial review. - The tribunal noted that any ad-interim relief obtained by the appellant against his wilful defaulter status did not override the CoC's decision-making power, as the stay was conditional and temporary.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4790
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
