Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Deduction u/s 80IA(4) - Disallowance of project facility expenses - Revenue expenses or Capital expenditure - Appellant was engaged in infrastructure development and toll road operation - Ld. CIT(A) upheld the appellant's claim, stating that these expenses did not create capital assets and were eligible for deduction under Section 80IA(4). The tribunal, following the principle of consistency, upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s decision, citing precedents where similar deductions were allowed, and dismissed the Revenue's appeal. Condonation of Delay: Despite the initial delay, the tri
Deduction u/s 80IA(4) - Disallowance of project facility expenses - Revenue expenses or Capital expenditure - Appellant was engaged in infrastructure development and toll road operation - Ld. CIT(A) upheld the appellant's claim, stating that these expenses did not create capital assets and were eligible for deduction under Section 80IA(4). The tribunal, following the principle of consistency, upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s decision, citing precedents where similar deductions were allowed, and dismissed the Revenue's appeal. Condonation of Delay: Despite the initial delay, the tri
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4786
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
