<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Affirms Deductibility of Infrastructure Project Expenses as Revenue, Dismissing Revenue&#039;s Appeal.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77061</link>
    <description>Deduction u/s 80IA(4) - Disallowance of project facility expenses - Revenue expenses or Capital expenditure - Appellant was engaged in infrastructure development and toll road operation - Ld. CIT(A) upheld the appellant&#039;s claim, stating that these expenses did not create capital assets and were eligible for deduction under Section 80IA(4). The tribunal, following the principle of consistency, upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision, citing precedents where similar deductions were allowed, and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Condonation of Delay: Despite the initial delay, the tri</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 08:25:52 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 08:25:52 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751739" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Affirms Deductibility of Infrastructure Project Expenses as Revenue, Dismissing Revenue&#039;s Appeal.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77061</link>
      <description>Deduction u/s 80IA(4) - Disallowance of project facility expenses - Revenue expenses or Capital expenditure - Appellant was engaged in infrastructure development and toll road operation - Ld. CIT(A) upheld the appellant&#039;s claim, stating that these expenses did not create capital assets and were eligible for deduction under Section 80IA(4). The tribunal, following the principle of consistency, upheld the Ld. CIT(A)&#039;s decision, citing precedents where similar deductions were allowed, and dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal. Condonation of Delay: Despite the initial delay, the tri</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 May 2024 08:25:52 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=77061</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>