Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
21 to 40 of 95633 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Deduction u/s 80IA(4) - Disallowance of project facility expenses - Revenue expenses or Capital expenditure - Appellant was engaged in infrastructure development and toll road operation - Ld. CIT(A) upheld the appellant's claim, stating that these expenses did not create capital assets and were eligible for deduction under Section 80IA(4). The tribunal, following the principle of consistency, upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s decision, citing precedents where similar deductions were allowed, and dismissed the Revenue's appeal. Condonation of Delay: Despite the initial delay, the tri
Deduction u/s 80IA(4) - Disallowance of project facility expenses - Revenue expenses or Capital expenditure - Appellant was engaged in infrastructure development and toll road operation - Ld. CIT(A) upheld the appellant's claim, stating that these expenses did not create capital assets and were eligible for deduction under Section 80IA(4). The tribunal, following the principle of consistency, upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s decision, citing precedents where similar deductions were allowed, and dismissed the Revenue's appeal. Condonation of Delay: Despite the initial delay, the tri
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.