Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Deduction u/s 80IA(4) - Disallowance of project facility expenses - Revenue expenses or Capital expenditure - Appellant was engaged in infrastructure development and toll road operation - Ld. CIT(A) upheld the appellant's claim, stating that these expenses did not create capital assets and were eligible for deduction under Section 80IA(4). The tribunal, following the principle of consistency, upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s decision, citing precedents where similar deductions were allowed, and dismissed the Revenue's appeal. Condonation of Delay: Despite the initial delay, the tri
Deduction u/s 80IA(4) - Disallowance of project facility expenses - Revenue expenses or Capital expenditure - Appellant was engaged in infrastructure development and toll road operation - Ld. CIT(A) upheld the appellant's claim, stating that these expenses did not create capital assets and were eligible for deduction under Section 80IA(4). The tribunal, following the principle of consistency, upheld the Ld. CIT(A)'s decision, citing precedents where similar deductions were allowed, and dismissed the Revenue's appeal. Condonation of Delay: Despite the initial delay, the tri
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.