Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Condonation of delay - substantial delay of 166 days before ITAT - The appellant argued that the delay in filing the appeal before the ITAT was due to the absence of real-time alerts for notices and orders on the e-filing portal. However, the High Court found no sufficient cause to condone the delay, considering the appellant's history of non-compliance and lack of participation in the assessment proceedings. The Court emphasized the importance of timely and active participation in legal proceedings, dismissing the appeal due to the appellant's lackadaisical approach and habitual defiance of law.
Condonation of delay - substantial delay of 166 days before ITAT - The appellant argued that the delay in filing the appeal before the ITAT was due to the absence of real-time alerts for notices and orders on the e-filing portal. However, the High Court found no sufficient cause to condone the delay, considering the appellant's history of non-compliance and lack of participation in the assessment proceedings. The Court emphasized the importance of timely and active participation in legal proceedings, dismissing the appeal due to the appellant's lackadaisical approach and habitual defiance of law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.