Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Condonation of delay - substantial delay of 166 days before ITAT - The appellant argued that the delay in filing the appeal before the ITAT was due to the absence of real-time alerts for notices and orders on the e-filing portal. However, the High Court found no sufficient cause to condone the delay, considering the appellant's history of non-compliance and lack of participation in the assessment proceedings. The Court emphasized the importance of timely and active participation in legal proceedings, dismissing the appeal due to the appellant's lackadaisical approach and habitual defiance of law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.