Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Insolvency and BankruptcyApril 25, 2024Case LawsAT
Rejection of Section 7 Application - NPA - Corporate Debtor unable to de-risk the live BGs within the time allowed - A settlement was reached between the parties, where the Corporate Debtor agreed to pay a certain amount and de-risk live Performance Bank Guarantees (PBGs) within specified timelines. - The Appellate Tribunal observed that the entire settlement amount had been paid by the Corporate Debtor within the specified timeline. The NCLAT acknowledged the Corporate Debtor's efforts to de-risk BGs, attributing any shortcomings to the Financial Creditor's refusal to accept CBGs or counter-guarantees. Since the BGs were not invoked, the Tribunal ruled that no debt had become due, and failure to de-risk BGs did not constitute default under the IBC. - In light of the above findings, the Appellate Tribunal directed the Corporate Debtor to deposit a specified amount with the Financial Creditor to clear any outstanding liabilities related to live PBGs.
Rejection of Section 7 Application - NPA - Corporate Debtor unable to de-risk the live BGs within the time allowed - A settlement was reached between the parties, where the Corporate Debtor agreed to pay a certain amount and de-risk live Performance Bank Guarantees (PBGs) within specified timelines. - The Appellate Tribunal observed that the entire settlement amount had been paid by the Corporate Debtor within the specified timeline. The NCLAT acknowledged the Corporate Debtor's efforts to de-risk BGs, attributing any shortcomings to the Financial Creditor's refusal to accept CBGs or counter-guarantees. Since the BGs were not invoked, the Tribunal ruled that no debt had become due, and failure to de-risk BGs did not constitute default under the IBC. - In light of the above findings, the Appellate Tribunal directed the Corporate Debtor to deposit a specified amount with the Financial Creditor to clear any outstanding liabilities related to live PBGs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
