<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Appellate Tribunal Rejects Insolvency Application; No Default Found as PBGs Uninvoked and Settlement Paid on Time.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76874</link>
    <description>Rejection of Section 7 Application - NPA - Corporate Debtor unable to de-risk the live BGs within the time allowed - A settlement was reached between the parties, where the Corporate Debtor agreed to pay a certain amount and de-risk live Performance Bank Guarantees (PBGs) within specified timelines. - The Appellate Tribunal observed that the entire settlement amount had been paid by the Corporate Debtor within the specified timeline. The NCLAT acknowledged the Corporate Debtor&#039;s efforts to de-risk BGs, attributing any shortcomings to the Financial Creditor&#039;s refusal to accept CBGs or counter-guarantees. Since the BGs were not invoked, the Tribunal ruled that no debt had become due, and failure to de-risk BGs did not constitute default under.....</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2024 07:22:42 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2024 07:22:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=751060" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Appellate Tribunal Rejects Insolvency Application; No Default Found as PBGs Uninvoked and Settlement Paid on Time.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76874</link>
      <description>Rejection of Section 7 Application - NPA - Corporate Debtor unable to de-risk the live BGs within the time allowed - A settlement was reached between the parties, where the Corporate Debtor agreed to pay a certain amount and de-risk live Performance Bank Guarantees (PBGs) within specified timelines. - The Appellate Tribunal observed that the entire settlement amount had been paid by the Corporate Debtor within the specified timeline. The NCLAT acknowledged the Corporate Debtor&#039;s efforts to de-risk BGs, attributing any shortcomings to the Financial Creditor&#039;s refusal to accept CBGs or counter-guarantees. Since the BGs were not invoked, the Tribunal ruled that no debt had become due, and failure to de-risk BGs did not constitute default under.....</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Apr 2024 07:22:42 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76874</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>