Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Insolvency and BankruptcyApril 25, 2024Case LawsAT
Rejection of Section 7 Application - NPA - Corporate Debtor unable to de-risk the live BGs within the time allowed - A settlement was reached between the parties, where the Corporate Debtor agreed to pay a certain amount and de-risk live Performance Bank Guarantees (PBGs) within specified timelines. - The Appellate Tribunal observed that the entire settlement amount had been paid by the Corporate Debtor within the specified timeline. The NCLAT acknowledged the Corporate Debtor's efforts to de-risk BGs, attributing any shortcomings to the Financial Creditor's refusal to accept CBGs or counter-guarantees. Since the BGs were not invoked, the Tribunal ruled that no debt had become due, and failure to de-risk BGs did not constitute default under the IBC. - In light of the above findings, the Appellate Tribunal directed the Corporate Debtor to deposit a specified amount with the Financial Creditor to clear any outstanding liabilities related to live PBGs.
Rejection of Section 7 Application - NPA - Corporate Debtor unable to de-risk the live BGs within the time allowed - A settlement was reached between the parties, where the Corporate Debtor agreed to pay a certain amount and de-risk live Performance Bank Guarantees (PBGs) within specified timelines. - The Appellate Tribunal observed that the entire settlement amount had been paid by the Corporate Debtor within the specified timeline. The NCLAT acknowledged the Corporate Debtor's efforts to de-risk BGs, attributing any shortcomings to the Financial Creditor's refusal to accept CBGs or counter-guarantees. Since the BGs were not invoked, the Tribunal ruled that no debt had become due, and failure to de-risk BGs did not constitute default under the IBC. - In light of the above findings, the Appellate Tribunal directed the Corporate Debtor to deposit a specified amount with the Financial Creditor to clear any outstanding liabilities related to live PBGs.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
