Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Obligation to pass a draft assessment order u/s 144C (1) - Petitioner asserts that even in partial remand proceedings from the Tribunal, the Assessing Officer (A.O.) is obliged to pass a draft assessment order u/s 144C - The High Court, referring to relevant precedents, holds that the A.O. is indeed obligated to pass a draft assessment order in all cases involving proposed variations in the returned income. It emphasizes that failure to comply with this procedure constitutes a jurisdictional error, rendering the impugned order void ab initio. Consequently, the High Court concludes that the impugned order lacks jurisdiction and must be quashed.
Obligation to pass a draft assessment order u/s 144C (1) - Petitioner asserts that even in partial remand proceedings from the Tribunal, the Assessing Officer (A.O.) is obliged to pass a draft assessment order u/s 144C - The High Court, referring to relevant precedents, holds that the A.O. is indeed obligated to pass a draft assessment order in all cases involving proposed variations in the returned income. It emphasizes that failure to comply with this procedure constitutes a jurisdictional error, rendering the impugned order void ab initio. Consequently, the High Court concludes that the impugned order lacks jurisdiction and must be quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
