<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Draft Assessment Order Required in Remand; Non-Compliance Renders Order Void Due to Jurisdictional Error.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76859</link>
    <description>Obligation to pass a draft assessment order u/s 144C (1) - Petitioner asserts that even in partial remand proceedings from the Tribunal, the Assessing Officer (A.O.) is obliged to pass a draft assessment order u/s 144C - The High Court, referring to relevant precedents, holds that the A.O. is indeed obligated to pass a draft assessment order in all cases involving proposed variations in the returned income. It emphasizes that failure to comply with this procedure constitutes a jurisdictional error, rendering the impugned order void ab initio. Consequently, the High Court concludes that the impugned order lacks jurisdiction and must be quashed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 18:09:12 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 18:09:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750972" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Draft Assessment Order Required in Remand; Non-Compliance Renders Order Void Due to Jurisdictional Error.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76859</link>
      <description>Obligation to pass a draft assessment order u/s 144C (1) - Petitioner asserts that even in partial remand proceedings from the Tribunal, the Assessing Officer (A.O.) is obliged to pass a draft assessment order u/s 144C - The High Court, referring to relevant precedents, holds that the A.O. is indeed obligated to pass a draft assessment order in all cases involving proposed variations in the returned income. It emphasizes that failure to comply with this procedure constitutes a jurisdictional error, rendering the impugned order void ab initio. Consequently, the High Court concludes that the impugned order lacks jurisdiction and must be quashed.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2024 18:09:12 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>