Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Validity of Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reason to believe - Reply of the assessee through reproduced but the contents thereof are not even referred or analyzed prima facie - The High Court observed that the Assessing Officer had not adequately considered the evidence presented by the petitioner in response to the notice. According to Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, the Assessing Officer is required to decide the validity of issuing a notice based on the material available, including the assessee's reply. However, in this case, the Assessing Officer's decision seemed to ignore the petitioner's evidence.
Validity of Reopening of assessment u/s 147 - reason to believe - Reply of the assessee through reproduced but the contents thereof are not even referred or analyzed prima facie - The High Court observed that the Assessing Officer had not adequately considered the evidence presented by the petitioner in response to the notice. According to Section 148A(d) of the Income Tax Act, the Assessing Officer is required to decide the validity of issuing a notice based on the material available, including the assessee's reply. However, in this case, the Assessing Officer's decision seemed to ignore the petitioner's evidence.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
