Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Arbitral Proceedings - Computation of one-year period for completing the proceedings - exclusion of days during which the proceedings were stayed - The High Court acknowledged the stay of proceedings ordered by the Court and held that the period during which the proceedings were stayed should be excluded from the calculation of the one-year period for making the award. They emphasized the principle that periods of stay ordered by courts should be excluded when calculating timelines. The Court reiterated the importance of adhering to the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to ensure the expeditious resolution of disputes.
Arbitral Proceedings - Computation of one-year period for completing the proceedings - exclusion of days during which the proceedings were stayed - The High Court acknowledged the stay of proceedings ordered by the Court and held that the period during which the proceedings were stayed should be excluded from the calculation of the one-year period for making the award. They emphasized the principle that periods of stay ordered by courts should be excluded when calculating timelines. The Court reiterated the importance of adhering to the provisions of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, to ensure the expeditious resolution of disputes.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.