Faceless reassessment jurisdiction turned on retrospective AO definition, with later faceless-assessment changes treated as clarificatory and procedur...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
2121 to 2140 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Insolvency and BankruptcyApril 23, 2024Case LawsAT
Fixation of IRP fees - lack of earnestness and proficiency on the part of the IRP - The Appellate Tribunal finds that the IRP's fees were initially quoted at a higher amount but were subsequently reduced by 50% to align with regulatory provisions. - While acknowledging delays in the CIRP process, the Tribunal attributes some of the responsibility to the Appellant for not showing optimal interest and decisiveness in furthering the process. It cites instances where the Appellant deferred decisions, contributing to the delay. - Ultimately, the Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority's decision and directed the Appellant to pay the IRP's fees and CIRP expenses.
Fixation of IRP fees - lack of earnestness and proficiency on the part of the IRP - The Appellate Tribunal finds that the IRP's fees were initially quoted at a higher amount but were subsequently reduced by 50% to align with regulatory provisions. - While acknowledging delays in the CIRP process, the Tribunal attributes some of the responsibility to the Appellant for not showing optimal interest and decisiveness in furthering the process. It cites instances where the Appellant deferred decisions, contributing to the delay. - Ultimately, the Tribunal upheld the Adjudicating Authority's decision and directed the Appellant to pay the IRP's fees and CIRP expenses.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
