Just a moment...
Convert scanned orders, printed notices, PDFs and images into clean, searchable, editable text within seconds. Starting at 2 Credits/page
Try Now →Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
Use comma for multiple locations.
---------------- For section wise search only -----------------
Accuracy Level ~ 90%
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Don't have an account? Register Here
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
Issues: Whether the fees of the erstwhile Interim Resolution Professional and the CIRP expenses, as approved by the Adjudicating Authority, were unreasonable or excessive so as to warrant interference in appeal.
Analysis: The IRP had carried out the steps required for the conduct of the CIRP, including public announcements, claim verification, constitution of the Committee of Creditors, filing of applications and reports, preparation of the information memorandum, request for resolution plan, evaluation matrix and participation in hearings. The delay in progress of the CIRP and in approving the liquidation proposal was attributable to the sole CoC member, which repeatedly deferred decisions and sought internal approval from higher authorities. The record also showed that the Appellant had not challenged the prior order attributing delay to it. The IRP had initially claimed higher fees but voluntarily reduced the amount to Rs. 1 lakh per month, and the expenses were also reduced by the Adjudicating Authority after considering the material placed before it.
Conclusion: The fees and expenses fixed by the Adjudicating Authority were found to be reasonable, and no ground for interference was made out.