Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
Addition u/s 40A(3) - Cash expenditure - assessee has made payments to the land owners exceeding INR 20,000/- - The Tribunal agreed with the appellant's argument to some extent, acknowledging that the disallowance should have been restricted to 20% of the total expenditure exceeding the prescribed limit. While the appellant failed to provide substantial evidence of business expediency, the Tribunal recognized that the disallowance should adhere to the provisions of section 40A(3), limiting it to 20%.
Addition u/s 40A(3) - Cash expenditure - assessee has made payments to the land owners exceeding INR 20,000/- - The Tribunal agreed with the appellant's argument to some extent, acknowledging that the disallowance should have been restricted to 20% of the total expenditure exceeding the prescribed limit. While the appellant failed to provide substantial evidence of business expediency, the Tribunal recognized that the disallowance should adhere to the provisions of section 40A(3), limiting it to 20%.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
