Cash payments over INR 20,000 to landowners: Only 20% disallowance under section 40A(3) despite business expediency claims

ITAT Delhi ruled on cash expenditure disallowance under section 40A(3) where assessee made payments exceeding INR 20,000 to land owners. The tribunal held that only 20% of such cash expenditure should be disallowed, rejecting assessee's business expediency argument due to lack of evidence. The tribunal directed AO to restrict disallowance to 20% of total cash expenditure exceeding the prescribed limit, partially allowing assessee's grounds of appeal.

---

---

Issues Involved:
1. Disallowance of expenditure u/s 40A(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

Comprehensive details of the judgment for each issue involved:

Issue 1: Disallowance of expenditure u/s 40A(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961
- The appeal was filed against the order disallowing the claim of expenditure of Rs. 53,69,758/- under section 40A(3) for the assessment year 2007-08.
- The Assessing Officer made an addition of INR 53,69,758/- to the income of the assessee, which was later sustained by Ld.CIT(A).
- The assessee contended that the entire disallowance of expenditure was contrary to the law, citing an amendment by the Finance Act, 2007 in section 40A(3) of the Act.
- The Tribunal observed that the assessee made payments exceeding INR 20,000/- to landowners, which contravened section 40A(3) of the Act.
- The Tribunal noted that the assessee did not fall under the exceptions provided in Rule 6DD of the Income Tax Rules, 1962.
- The provision of section 40A(3) was amended w.e.f. 01.04.2008, limiting the disallowance to 20% of the expenditure exceeding INR 20,000/- made in cash.
- The Tribunal directed the Assessing Officer to restrict the disallowance to 20% of the total expenditure exceeding INR 20,000/- made in cash, partially allowing the appeal of the assessee.

This judgment addresses the issue of disallowance of expenditure under section 40A(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the assessment year 2007-08. The Tribunal found that the assessee's payments to landowners exceeding INR 20,000/- were in contravention of the provision. While the assessee argued for business expediency, the Tribunal emphasized the lack of evidence supporting this claim. The Tribunal upheld the disallowance but directed the restriction of disallowed expenditure to 20% of the total cash expenditure exceeding INR 20,000/-.

---