Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Addition u/s 40A(3) - Cash expenditure - assessee has made payments to the land owners exceeding INR 20,000/- - The Tribunal agreed with the appellant's argument to some extent, acknowledging that the disallowance should have been restricted to 20% of the total expenditure exceeding the prescribed limit. While the appellant failed to provide substantial evidence of business expediency, the Tribunal recognized that the disallowance should adhere to the provisions of section 40A(3), limiting it to 20%.
Addition u/s 40A(3) - Cash expenditure - assessee has made payments to the land owners exceeding INR 20,000/- - The Tribunal agreed with the appellant's argument to some extent, acknowledging that the disallowance should have been restricted to 20% of the total expenditure exceeding the prescribed limit. While the appellant failed to provide substantial evidence of business expediency, the Tribunal recognized that the disallowance should adhere to the provisions of section 40A(3), limiting it to 20%.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
