Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Page of 4782
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95636 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rectification of mistake - period of limitation - To give appeal effect of orders passed by the ITAT and issue a refund. - The High Court referred to the interpretation of the term "received" and its implications, emphasizing that the limitation period should commence when the Department becomes aware of the order, not necessarily when the certified copy is physically received. - In light of the principles established in previous cases, including CIT v. Odeon Builders P. Ltd. and Lakhpatrai Agarwal v. CIT, the Court held that the Department's failure to comply with the ITAT's order within the stipulated time was unjustified.
Rectification of mistake - period of limitation - To give appeal effect of orders passed by the ITAT and issue a refund. - The High Court referred to the interpretation of the term "received" and its implications, emphasizing that the limitation period should commence when the Department becomes aware of the order, not necessarily when the certified copy is physically received. - In light of the principles established in previous cases, including CIT v. Odeon Builders P. Ltd. and Lakhpatrai Agarwal v. CIT, the Court held that the Department's failure to comply with the ITAT's order within the stipulated time was unjustified.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.