<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tax Tribunal Order Compliance Starts Upon Awareness, Not Receipt, Court Rules on Refunds and Limitation Periods.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76710</link>
    <description>Rectification of mistake - period of limitation - To give appeal effect of orders passed by the ITAT and issue a refund. - The High Court referred to the interpretation of the term &quot;received&quot; and its implications, emphasizing that the limitation period should commence when the Department becomes aware of the order, not necessarily when the certified copy is physically received. - In light of the principles established in previous cases, including CIT v. Odeon Builders P. Ltd. and Lakhpatrai Agarwal v. CIT, the Court held that the Department&#039;s failure to comply with the ITAT&#039;s order within the stipulated time was unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 18:23:18 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 18:23:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=750433" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tax Tribunal Order Compliance Starts Upon Awareness, Not Receipt, Court Rules on Refunds and Limitation Periods.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76710</link>
      <description>Rectification of mistake - period of limitation - To give appeal effect of orders passed by the ITAT and issue a refund. - The High Court referred to the interpretation of the term &quot;received&quot; and its implications, emphasizing that the limitation period should commence when the Department becomes aware of the order, not necessarily when the certified copy is physically received. - In light of the principles established in previous cases, including CIT v. Odeon Builders P. Ltd. and Lakhpatrai Agarwal v. CIT, the Court held that the Department&#039;s failure to comply with the ITAT&#039;s order within the stipulated time was unjustified.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 18 Apr 2024 18:23:18 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76710</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>