Alternative statutory remedy and unexplained delay barred writ review of customs confiscation adjudication, leaving merits for appellate consideration...
Authorised courier due diligence protects against penalties where declared exports conceal prohibited goods despite proper documentation and customs p...
Customs-controlled container movement now extends to DP World facilities, subject to segregation, inspections, reconciliation, and EXIM cargo priority...
Interpretation of a contract condition, which required the measurement of quantities used for payment for embankment construction with soil or with pond ash - Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - The Supreme Court meticulously dissected the contractual provisions, the arbitral awards, and the technical specifications, emphasizing the need for a harmonious interpretation. The Court underscored the value of technical expertise in arbitration, particularly in disputes involving complex technical questions. The majority opinion of the arbitration tribunal, which favored a composite measurement approach, was considered plausible within the contractual framework. The Supreme Court overturned the judgments of the High Court that had favored NHAI's interpretation, reinstating the majority arbitral awards that supported the contractors' perspective.
Interpretation of a contract condition, which required the measurement of quantities used for payment for embankment construction with soil or with pond ash - Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - The Supreme Court meticulously dissected the contractual provisions, the arbitral awards, and the technical specifications, emphasizing the need for a harmonious interpretation. The Court underscored the value of technical expertise in arbitration, particularly in disputes involving complex technical questions. The majority opinion of the arbitration tribunal, which favored a composite measurement approach, was considered plausible within the contractual framework. The Supreme Court overturned the judgments of the High Court that had favored NHAI's interpretation, reinstating the majority arbitral awards that supported the contractors' perspective.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
