Political contribution deductions require genuine transactions; banking records and party registration alone cannot defeat evidence of accommodation e...
Post-death GST liability permits fresh proceedings against legal representatives, while discontinued-business recovery remains limited to the inherite...
Non-confirmation of FEMA seizure prevents adjudicators from overriding pending appellate findings on recorded reasons and suspected foreign asset hold...
Benefit of SVLDRS - Discrepancies in the petitioner's declaration under the scheme, alleging incorrect categorization and pending litigation. - The High Court found that the Designated Committee violated principles of natural justice by directly issuing Form SVLDRS-3 without providing the petitioner an opportunity for a personal hearing, as mandated by the Sabka Vishwas Scheme and its rules. - Given the procedural irregularities and the failure to adhere to the prescribed process, the High Court quashed both the Form SVLDRS-3 and the Show Cause Notice.
Benefit of SVLDRS - Discrepancies in the petitioner's declaration under the scheme, alleging incorrect categorization and pending litigation. - The High Court found that the Designated Committee violated principles of natural justice by directly issuing Form SVLDRS-3 without providing the petitioner an opportunity for a personal hearing, as mandated by the Sabka Vishwas Scheme and its rules. - Given the procedural irregularities and the failure to adhere to the prescribed process, the High Court quashed both the Form SVLDRS-3 and the Show Cause Notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.