Cases where this provision is explicitly mentioned in the judgment/order text; may not be exhaustive. To view the complete list of cases mentioning this section, Click here.
Provisions expressly mentioned in the judgment/order text.
Addition of cash deposits u/s 68 - abnormal sales reported by the assessee during demonetized period - The Tribunal found no merit in the Revenue's argument that the sales were abnormal, highlighting that no concrete evidence was presented to substantiate the claim of unaccounted money being introduced as sales. Furthermore, the Tribunal noted the impossibility of producing CCTV footage as demanded by the Revenue, years after the transactions took place. Based on the thorough documentation provided by the assessee, the Tribunal ruled that the cash deposits were sourced from legitimate sales proceeds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.