Arrest safeguards and transit remand requirements invalidated detention following inter-State transfer without communicated grounds or magistrate auth...
Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Money Laundering - Scheduled offences - whether the Non-Bailable Warrants (NBW) issued against the petitioner are liable to be quashed? - The High Court affirmed the trial court's decision to issue NBWs against the petitioner, citing repeated non-compliance with court summons and a deliberate avoidance of legal proceedings. The Court underscored that the issuance of NBWs was a measured response to ensure the petitioner's court appearance, given the lack of cooperation and evasion from the judicial process. - The judgment reaffirms the principle that while courts must safeguard personal liberty, they must also ensure that such liberty does not undermine the legal process or obstruct justice.
Money Laundering - Scheduled offences - whether the Non-Bailable Warrants (NBW) issued against the petitioner are liable to be quashed? - The High Court affirmed the trial court's decision to issue NBWs against the petitioner, citing repeated non-compliance with court summons and a deliberate avoidance of legal proceedings. The Court underscored that the issuance of NBWs was a measured response to ensure the petitioner's court appearance, given the lack of cooperation and evasion from the judicial process. - The judgment reaffirms the principle that while courts must safeguard personal liberty, they must also ensure that such liberty does not undermine the legal process or obstruct justice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.