<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Upholds Non-Bailable Warrants for Non-Compliance and Evasion, Balancing Liberty and Justice.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76286</link>
    <description>Money Laundering - Scheduled offences - whether the Non-Bailable Warrants (NBW) issued against the petitioner are liable to be quashed? - The High Court affirmed the trial court&#039;s decision to issue NBWs against the petitioner, citing repeated non-compliance with court summons and a deliberate avoidance of legal proceedings. The Court underscored that the issuance of NBWs was a measured response to ensure the petitioner&#039;s court appearance, given the lack of cooperation and evasion from the judicial process. - The judgment reaffirms the principle that while courts must safeguard personal liberty, they must also ensure that such liberty does not undermine the legal process or obstruct justice.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 06:25:34 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 06:25:34 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748896" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Upholds Non-Bailable Warrants for Non-Compliance and Evasion, Balancing Liberty and Justice.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76286</link>
      <description>Money Laundering - Scheduled offences - whether the Non-Bailable Warrants (NBW) issued against the petitioner are liable to be quashed? - The High Court affirmed the trial court&#039;s decision to issue NBWs against the petitioner, citing repeated non-compliance with court summons and a deliberate avoidance of legal proceedings. The Court underscored that the issuance of NBWs was a measured response to ensure the petitioner&#039;s court appearance, given the lack of cooperation and evasion from the judicial process. - The judgment reaffirms the principle that while courts must safeguard personal liberty, they must also ensure that such liberty does not undermine the legal process or obstruct justice.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Money Laundering</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2024 06:25:34 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76286</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>