Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Classification of imported goods - AJI-NO-MOTO - The main contention was whether Ajitide I+G should be classified as a miscellaneous chemical product or as a food flavouring material. The Tribunal examined the product's usage, characteristics, and industry perception, concluding that it functions both as a flavour enhancer and imparts the umami taste, fitting more accurately under the category of food flavouring materials under CTH 2106 9060. - Since the Tribunal found the product to be correctly classified under food flavouring materials, it ruled that the appellant was not eligible for the claimed exemption.
Classification of imported goods - AJI-NO-MOTO - The main contention was whether Ajitide I+G should be classified as a miscellaneous chemical product or as a food flavouring material. The Tribunal examined the product's usage, characteristics, and industry perception, concluding that it functions both as a flavour enhancer and imparts the umami taste, fitting more accurately under the category of food flavouring materials under CTH 2106 9060. - Since the Tribunal found the product to be correctly classified under food flavouring materials, it ruled that the appellant was not eligible for the claimed exemption.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
