<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Rules Ajitide I+G as Food Flavouring, Not Miscellaneous Chemical, Affecting Exemption Eligibility.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76268</link>
    <description>Classification of imported goods - AJI-NO-MOTO - The main contention was whether Ajitide I+G should be classified as a miscellaneous chemical product or as a food flavouring material. The Tribunal examined the product&#039;s usage, characteristics, and industry perception, concluding that it functions both as a flavour enhancer and imparts the umami taste, fitting more accurately under the category of food flavouring materials under CTH 2106 9060. - Since the Tribunal found the product to be correctly classified under food flavouring materials, it ruled that the appellant was not eligible for the claimed exemption.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 08:20:03 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 08:20:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=748836" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Rules Ajitide I+G as Food Flavouring, Not Miscellaneous Chemical, Affecting Exemption Eligibility.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76268</link>
      <description>Classification of imported goods - AJI-NO-MOTO - The main contention was whether Ajitide I+G should be classified as a miscellaneous chemical product or as a food flavouring material. The Tribunal examined the product&#039;s usage, characteristics, and industry perception, concluding that it functions both as a flavour enhancer and imparts the umami taste, fitting more accurately under the category of food flavouring materials under CTH 2106 9060. - Since the Tribunal found the product to be correctly classified under food flavouring materials, it ruled that the appellant was not eligible for the claimed exemption.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Apr 2024 08:20:03 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=76268</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>