Electronic WhatsApp evidence without authentication or independent corroboration cannot sustain an unexplained-investment addition based on third-part...
Mutual current-account transactions excluded from deemed dividend treatment where no fresh borrowing arose; unsupported unsecured-loan addition also f...
Addition u/s 69A - unexplained cash deposits in the bank account - onus to prove - The Tribunal noted that the appellant had provided evidence to support the source of cash deposits, demonstrating legitimate cash withdrawals preceding the deposits. It concluded that the Assessing Officer had not presented any adverse material to refute the appellant's claims. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the AO to delete the impugned addition under section 69A.
Addition u/s 69A - unexplained cash deposits in the bank account - onus to prove - The Tribunal noted that the appellant had provided evidence to support the source of cash deposits, demonstrating legitimate cash withdrawals preceding the deposits. It concluded that the Assessing Officer had not presented any adverse material to refute the appellant's claims. Therefore, the Tribunal directed the AO to delete the impugned addition under section 69A.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
