Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
821 to 840 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Valuation - inclusion of advertisement and publicity expenses incurred by the dealers as per the terms and conditions of the dealership agreement mutually agreed between the appellant and their dealers, in the assessable value of the vehicles sold by the appellant - The Tribunal found that the dealership agreement did not impose an enforceable right on the appellant to require dealers to incur specific advertisement expenses. It concluded that since the expenses were incurred at the dealers' discretion and the sale price of vehicles to dealers was unaffected by whether dealers chose to advertise, such expenses should not be included in the assessable value.
Valuation - inclusion of advertisement and publicity expenses incurred by the dealers as per the terms and conditions of the dealership agreement mutually agreed between the appellant and their dealers, in the assessable value of the vehicles sold by the appellant - The Tribunal found that the dealership agreement did not impose an enforceable right on the appellant to require dealers to incur specific advertisement expenses. It concluded that since the expenses were incurred at the dealers' discretion and the sale price of vehicles to dealers was unaffected by whether dealers chose to advertise, such expenses should not be included in the assessable value.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.