Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
- ⚖️ Instantly identify judgments decided in favour of the Assessee, Revenue, or Appellant
- 🔍 Narrow down results with higher precision
Try it now in Case Laws →
TaxTMI Login
🚀 New Feature Launched ✕
Just a moment...
Introducing the “In Favour Of” filter in Case Laws.
Try it now in Case Laws →
Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search
of 
of 
No Folders have been created
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NOTE:
of of 
All Highlights
of of All Highlights
Note
Bookmark
Share
Don't have an account? Register Here
of Valuation - inclusion of advertisement and publicity expenses incurred by the dealers as per the terms and conditions of the dealership agreement mutually agreed between the appellant and their dealers, in the assessable value of the vehicles sold by the appellant - The Tribunal found that the dealership agreement did not impose an enforceable right on the appellant to require dealers to incur specific advertisement expenses. It concluded that since the expenses were incurred at the dealers' discretion and the sale price of vehicles to dealers was unaffected by whether dealers chose to advertise, such expenses should not be included in the assessable value.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
