Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
601 to 620 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Estimation of income - bogus purchases - case of bogus bills arranged from the entities and diamonds purchased from somewhere else at a lower cost - The ITAT noted the absence of crucial documentation, such as delivery challans, to substantiate the purchases. Consequently, the disallowance of purchases was upheld. - Considering the appellant's argument for a lower percentage of disallowance based on the profit margin accepted in other assessment years, the Tribunal decided to restrict the disallowance to 5% of the disputed purchases, consistent with previous decisions in the appellant's case.
Estimation of income - bogus purchases - case of bogus bills arranged from the entities and diamonds purchased from somewhere else at a lower cost - The ITAT noted the absence of crucial documentation, such as delivery challans, to substantiate the purchases. Consequently, the disallowance of purchases was upheld. - Considering the appellant's argument for a lower percentage of disallowance based on the profit margin accepted in other assessment years, the Tribunal decided to restrict the disallowance to 5% of the disputed purchases, consistent with previous decisions in the appellant's case.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
