<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Limits Disallowance to 5% on Disputed Purchases Due to Lack of Documentation and Accepted Profit Margins.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75980</link>
    <description>Estimation of income - bogus purchases - case of bogus bills arranged from the entities and diamonds purchased from somewhere else at a lower cost - The ITAT noted the absence of crucial documentation, such as delivery challans, to substantiate the purchases. Consequently, the disallowance of purchases was upheld. - Considering the appellant&#039;s argument for a lower percentage of disallowance based on the profit margin accepted in other assessment years, the Tribunal decided to restrict the disallowance to 5% of the disputed purchases, consistent with previous decisions in the appellant&#039;s case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2024 10:05:45 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2024 10:05:45 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747906" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Limits Disallowance to 5% on Disputed Purchases Due to Lack of Documentation and Accepted Profit Margins.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75980</link>
      <description>Estimation of income - bogus purchases - case of bogus bills arranged from the entities and diamonds purchased from somewhere else at a lower cost - The ITAT noted the absence of crucial documentation, such as delivery challans, to substantiate the purchases. Consequently, the disallowance of purchases was upheld. - Considering the appellant&#039;s argument for a lower percentage of disallowance based on the profit margin accepted in other assessment years, the Tribunal decided to restrict the disallowance to 5% of the disputed purchases, consistent with previous decisions in the appellant&#039;s case.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2024 10:05:45 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75980</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>