Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Defined public benefit can retain charitable character; registration renewal requires examining genuine activities and legal compliance, not surplus a...
Capital reduction is distinct from share buy-back, preventing buy-back tax; restructuring interest and related business deductions also survive scruti...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
981 to 1000 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rejection of the books of account of the assessee company u/s. 145(3) - Estimation of income - The ITAT found the rejection of books of accounts by the AO unjustified as there was no evidence of incorrectness or incompleteness. - The AO's reliance on media clippings and reports without concrete proof was deemed insufficient to reject the books. - On the issue of cash deposits during demonetization, the Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer's presumption of antedating sales and earning super profits lacked substantiation and relied heavily on speculation. - The Tribunal rejected the AO's presumption of a 25% profit margin on sales and found no basis for the addition.
Rejection of the books of account of the assessee company u/s. 145(3) - Estimation of income - The ITAT found the rejection of books of accounts by the AO unjustified as there was no evidence of incorrectness or incompleteness. - The AO's reliance on media clippings and reports without concrete proof was deemed insufficient to reject the books. - On the issue of cash deposits during demonetization, the Tribunal noted that the Assessing Officer's presumption of antedating sales and earning super profits lacked substantiation and relied heavily on speculation. - The Tribunal rejected the AO's presumption of a 25% profit margin on sales and found no basis for the addition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.