Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Approval u/s 80G(5)(iii) - time limit - The ITAT highlighted the distinction between applications for renewal and fresh registration, as well as the prescribed time limits for each. - The Tribunal concluded that the appellant's application for final approval was valid, despite having commenced activities before provisional registration. It clarified that the application could not be rejected solely on the grounds of the appellant's prior commencement of activities, as long as provisional registration had been granted. - It emphasized that the appellant's choice to apply for fresh provisional registration did not preclude them from subsequently applying for final approval.
Approval u/s 80G(5)(iii) - time limit - The ITAT highlighted the distinction between applications for renewal and fresh registration, as well as the prescribed time limits for each. - The Tribunal concluded that the appellant's application for final approval was valid, despite having commenced activities before provisional registration. It clarified that the application could not be rejected solely on the grounds of the appellant's prior commencement of activities, as long as provisional registration had been granted. - It emphasized that the appellant's choice to apply for fresh provisional registration did not preclude them from subsequently applying for final approval.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4782
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
