<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Clarifies Renewal vs. Fresh Registration u/s 80G(5)(iii) of Income Tax Act; Validates Appellant&#039;s Application.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75921</link>
    <description>Approval u/s 80G(5)(iii) - time limit - The ITAT highlighted the distinction between applications for renewal and fresh registration, as well as the prescribed time limits for each. - The Tribunal concluded that the appellant&#039;s application for final approval was valid, despite having commenced activities before provisional registration. It clarified that the application could not be rejected solely on the grounds of the appellant&#039;s prior commencement of activities, as long as provisional registration had been granted. - It emphasized that the appellant&#039;s choice to apply for fresh provisional registration did not preclude them from subsequently applying for final approval.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:23:41 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:23:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747717" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Clarifies Renewal vs. Fresh Registration u/s 80G(5)(iii) of Income Tax Act; Validates Appellant&#039;s Application.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75921</link>
      <description>Approval u/s 80G(5)(iii) - time limit - The ITAT highlighted the distinction between applications for renewal and fresh registration, as well as the prescribed time limits for each. - The Tribunal concluded that the appellant&#039;s application for final approval was valid, despite having commenced activities before provisional registration. It clarified that the application could not be rejected solely on the grounds of the appellant&#039;s prior commencement of activities, as long as provisional registration had been granted. - It emphasized that the appellant&#039;s choice to apply for fresh provisional registration did not preclude them from subsequently applying for final approval.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2024 09:23:41 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75921</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>