Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Validity of assessment order - mismatch between the GSTR 3B returns filed by the petitioner and the auto-populated GSTR 2A returns - The High court acknowledged the existence of difficulties arising from the mismatch between GSTR 3B and GSTR 2A returns, as evidenced by the issuance of Circular No.183. Despite the petitioner's non-participation in the assessment proceedings, the court considered the certificate from the Chartered Accountant provided by the petitioner and deemed it sufficient justification for interference with the impugned orders. - The court quashed the assessment orders and remanded the matters for reconsideration with the condition that the petitioner remits 10% of the disputed tax demand for each assessment period within 15 days.
Validity of assessment order - mismatch between the GSTR 3B returns filed by the petitioner and the auto-populated GSTR 2A returns - The High court acknowledged the existence of difficulties arising from the mismatch between GSTR 3B and GSTR 2A returns, as evidenced by the issuance of Circular No.183. Despite the petitioner's non-participation in the assessment proceedings, the court considered the certificate from the Chartered Accountant provided by the petitioner and deemed it sufficient justification for interference with the impugned orders. - The court quashed the assessment orders and remanded the matters for reconsideration with the condition that the petitioner remits 10% of the disputed tax demand for each assessment period within 15 days.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
