<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Quashes Tax Assessment Orders Over GSTR Mismatch, Requires Partial Payment for Reconsideration.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75887</link>
    <description>Validity of assessment order - mismatch between the GSTR 3B returns filed by the petitioner and the auto-populated GSTR 2A returns - The High court acknowledged the existence of difficulties arising from the mismatch between GSTR 3B and GSTR 2A returns, as evidenced by the issuance of Circular No.183. Despite the petitioner&#039;s non-participation in the assessment proceedings, the court considered the certificate from the Chartered Accountant provided by the petitioner and deemed it sufficient justification for interference with the impugned orders. - The court quashed the assessment orders and remanded the matters for reconsideration with the condition that the petitioner remits 10% of the disputed tax demand for each assessment period within 15 days.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:22:28 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:22:28 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747595" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Quashes Tax Assessment Orders Over GSTR Mismatch, Requires Partial Payment for Reconsideration.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75887</link>
      <description>Validity of assessment order - mismatch between the GSTR 3B returns filed by the petitioner and the auto-populated GSTR 2A returns - The High court acknowledged the existence of difficulties arising from the mismatch between GSTR 3B and GSTR 2A returns, as evidenced by the issuance of Circular No.183. Despite the petitioner&#039;s non-participation in the assessment proceedings, the court considered the certificate from the Chartered Accountant provided by the petitioner and deemed it sufficient justification for interference with the impugned orders. - The court quashed the assessment orders and remanded the matters for reconsideration with the condition that the petitioner remits 10% of the disputed tax demand for each assessment period within 15 days.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:22:28 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75887</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>