Bogus donation receipts justified commission income assessment and defeated political-party tax exemption for inaccurate accounts and reporting failur...
Pure reimbursement without income element escapes tax withholding, while delayed withholding and unsupported provisions face deferred or renewed scrut...
Public benefit requirement defeats charitable registration where residents' association services are reciprocal, member-only facilities governed by mu...
Exempt-income expenditure disallowance is confined to investments that actually generated exempt income, while supported business expenses remain dedu...
Objective characteristics and principal use govern mining-tyre classification, while fresh advance ruling applications may rely on additional technica...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
801 to 820 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Attachment of Bank Account - Orders passed u/s 83(1) of the CGST Act - Period of limitation - The court acknowledges the statutory provision cited by the petitioner, confirming that orders under Section 83(1) of the CGST Act have a lifespan of one year and cease to operate thereafter. As the orders in question have expired, the court finds no basis for continuing the attachment. - While the respondents admit to issuing a fresh attachment order on 13.12.2023, the court does not delve into the validity of this specific order. Instead, it reserves the petitioner's right to challenge the fresh attachment order separately, leaving the question of its validity open for future adjudication.
Attachment of Bank Account - Orders passed u/s 83(1) of the CGST Act - Period of limitation - The court acknowledges the statutory provision cited by the petitioner, confirming that orders under Section 83(1) of the CGST Act have a lifespan of one year and cease to operate thereafter. As the orders in question have expired, the court finds no basis for continuing the attachment. - While the respondents admit to issuing a fresh attachment order on 13.12.2023, the court does not delve into the validity of this specific order. Instead, it reserves the petitioner's right to challenge the fresh attachment order separately, leaving the question of its validity open for future adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
