<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Lifts Expired Bank Account Attachment Order; New Order Challengeable Separately by Petitioner.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75881</link>
    <description>Attachment of Bank Account - Orders passed u/s 83(1) of the CGST Act - Period of limitation - The court acknowledges the statutory provision cited by the petitioner, confirming that orders under Section 83(1) of the CGST Act have a lifespan of one year and cease to operate thereafter. As the orders in question have expired, the court finds no basis for continuing the attachment. - While the respondents admit to issuing a fresh attachment order on 13.12.2023, the court does not delve into the validity of this specific order. Instead, it reserves the petitioner&#039;s right to challenge the fresh attachment order separately, leaving the question of its validity open for future adjudication.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:21:02 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:21:02 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747580" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Lifts Expired Bank Account Attachment Order; New Order Challengeable Separately by Petitioner.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75881</link>
      <description>Attachment of Bank Account - Orders passed u/s 83(1) of the CGST Act - Period of limitation - The court acknowledges the statutory provision cited by the petitioner, confirming that orders under Section 83(1) of the CGST Act have a lifespan of one year and cease to operate thereafter. As the orders in question have expired, the court finds no basis for continuing the attachment. - While the respondents admit to issuing a fresh attachment order on 13.12.2023, the court does not delve into the validity of this specific order. Instead, it reserves the petitioner&#039;s right to challenge the fresh attachment order separately, leaving the question of its validity open for future adjudication.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:21:02 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75881</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>