Invoice-based recovery claims remain time-barred despite separate winding-up proceedings, absent valid acknowledgment or part-payment of the disputed ...
Extended limitation fails without specific suppression allegations, while overseas employee secondment remains taxable as manpower supply within norma...
Time-share accommodation classification excludes Club or Association Service where purchasers receive contractual occupancy rights without genuine mem...
CENVAT credit for trading requires reversal, while taxable-service rental credit remains proportionately available and limitation issues await resolut...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Attachment of Bank Account - Orders passed u/s 83(1) of the CGST Act - Period of limitation - The court acknowledges the statutory provision cited by the petitioner, confirming that orders under Section 83(1) of the CGST Act have a lifespan of one year and cease to operate thereafter. As the orders in question have expired, the court finds no basis for continuing the attachment. - While the respondents admit to issuing a fresh attachment order on 13.12.2023, the court does not delve into the validity of this specific order. Instead, it reserves the petitioner's right to challenge the fresh attachment order separately, leaving the question of its validity open for future adjudication.
Attachment of Bank Account - Orders passed u/s 83(1) of the CGST Act - Period of limitation - The court acknowledges the statutory provision cited by the petitioner, confirming that orders under Section 83(1) of the CGST Act have a lifespan of one year and cease to operate thereafter. As the orders in question have expired, the court finds no basis for continuing the attachment. - While the respondents admit to issuing a fresh attachment order on 13.12.2023, the court does not delve into the validity of this specific order. Instead, it reserves the petitioner's right to challenge the fresh attachment order separately, leaving the question of its validity open for future adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.