Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Page of 4792
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
221 to 240 of 95833 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Attachment of Bank Account - Orders passed u/s 83(1) of the CGST Act - Period of limitation - The court acknowledges the statutory provision cited by the petitioner, confirming that orders under Section 83(1) of the CGST Act have a lifespan of one year and cease to operate thereafter. As the orders in question have expired, the court finds no basis for continuing the attachment. - While the respondents admit to issuing a fresh attachment order on 13.12.2023, the court does not delve into the validity of this specific order. Instead, it reserves the petitioner's right to challenge the fresh attachment order separately, leaving the question of its validity open for future adjudication.
Attachment of Bank Account - Orders passed u/s 83(1) of the CGST Act - Period of limitation - The court acknowledges the statutory provision cited by the petitioner, confirming that orders under Section 83(1) of the CGST Act have a lifespan of one year and cease to operate thereafter. As the orders in question have expired, the court finds no basis for continuing the attachment. - While the respondents admit to issuing a fresh attachment order on 13.12.2023, the court does not delve into the validity of this specific order. Instead, it reserves the petitioner's right to challenge the fresh attachment order separately, leaving the question of its validity open for future adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.