Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Page of 4796
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
301 to 320 of 95918 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rejection of appeal filled u/s 107 on the ground of delay - Cancellation of GST registration - The court noted that while the petitioner disputed the delay, the appellate authority determined it to be 73 days. The court acknowledged that the delay was beyond the condonable period. - The court considered the petitioner's ill health and medical condition as sufficient cause for the delay in filing the appeal. They found that the petitioner had provided evidence, including a doctor's certificate, to support their claim. - In the interest of justice and considering the appeal as a valuable statutory right, the court decided to condone the delay by imposing a cost of Rs. 20,000.
Rejection of appeal filled u/s 107 on the ground of delay - Cancellation of GST registration - The court noted that while the petitioner disputed the delay, the appellate authority determined it to be 73 days. The court acknowledged that the delay was beyond the condonable period. - The court considered the petitioner's ill health and medical condition as sufficient cause for the delay in filing the appeal. They found that the petitioner had provided evidence, including a doctor's certificate, to support their claim. - In the interest of justice and considering the appeal as a valuable statutory right, the court decided to condone the delay by imposing a cost of Rs. 20,000.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.