<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Court Condones 73-Day Delay in GST Appeal Due to Ill Health; Petitioner Faces Rs. 20,000 Cost for Appeal to Proceed.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75880</link>
    <description>Rejection of appeal filled u/s 107 on the ground of delay - Cancellation of GST registration - The court noted that while the petitioner disputed the delay, the appellate authority determined it to be 73 days. The court acknowledged that the delay was beyond the condonable period. - The court considered the petitioner&#039;s ill health and medical condition as sufficient cause for the delay in filing the appeal. They found that the petitioner had provided evidence, including a doctor&#039;s certificate, to support their claim. - In the interest of justice and considering the appeal as a valuable statutory right, the court decided to condone the delay by imposing a cost of Rs. 20,000.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:20:56 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:20:56 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747578" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Court Condones 73-Day Delay in GST Appeal Due to Ill Health; Petitioner Faces Rs. 20,000 Cost for Appeal to Proceed.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75880</link>
      <description>Rejection of appeal filled u/s 107 on the ground of delay - Cancellation of GST registration - The court noted that while the petitioner disputed the delay, the appellate authority determined it to be 73 days. The court acknowledged that the delay was beyond the condonable period. - The court considered the petitioner&#039;s ill health and medical condition as sufficient cause for the delay in filing the appeal. They found that the petitioner had provided evidence, including a doctor&#039;s certificate, to support their claim. - In the interest of justice and considering the appeal as a valuable statutory right, the court decided to condone the delay by imposing a cost of Rs. 20,000.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:20:56 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75880</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>