Patent-settlement expenditure treated as commercially expedient revenue outlay, with foreign-law restrictions inapplicable before the prospective amen...
International transaction benchmarking restricts transfer pricing adjustments to associated-enterprise dealings, while functional comparability govern...
Validity of Revision u/s 263 - The tribunal held that the exercise of the second revision jurisdiction by the PCIT on the same issue was not justified. It noted that the AO had made necessary inquiries as per the directions of the first PCIT and that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to prove the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the share subscribers.
Validity of Revision u/s 263 - The tribunal held that the exercise of the second revision jurisdiction by the PCIT on the same issue was not justified. It noted that the AO had made necessary inquiries as per the directions of the first PCIT and that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to prove the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the share subscribers.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.