<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Tribunal Rules Second Revision by Tax Commissioner Unjustified; Assessee Met All Evidence Requirements on Share Subscribers.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75873</link>
    <description>Validity of Revision u/s 263 - The tribunal held that the exercise of the second revision jurisdiction by the PCIT on the same issue was not justified. It noted that the AO had made necessary inquiries as per the directions of the first PCIT and that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to prove the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the share subscribers.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:19:04 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:19:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=747561" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>Tribunal Rules Second Revision by Tax Commissioner Unjustified; Assessee Met All Evidence Requirements on Share Subscribers.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75873</link>
      <description>Validity of Revision u/s 263 - The tribunal held that the exercise of the second revision jurisdiction by the PCIT on the same issue was not justified. It noted that the AO had made necessary inquiries as per the directions of the first PCIT and that the assessee had provided sufficient evidence to prove the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the share subscribers.</description>
      <category>Highlights</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Mar 2024 09:19:04 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/highlights?id=75873</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>